That means that the underlying tables and structures can be opened by MS Access and other programs which allows for third party application development. Legacy is using a world known database structure behind the scenes called Microsoft Access. And even more important, a real desctiption of what the infrastructure is with the competing system. What you should be asking is a detailed explanation of what they consider to be obsolete. It is quite simple for anyone to state that a program is using obsolete infrastructure. I could go on and on, but ultimately you will need to make your own decision and what features are a priority for you. I think the full feature programs are well worth the $. Unfortunately, you cannot test either programs deluxe features unless you buy the programs. I don't know if that helps, but I would download both RM and Legacy's free versions and add people and play around and compare. The Help section is fantastic and I can get almost all my questions answered by searching there. I love the customized searches and how one can use them with the Tagging feature. I love the Source Writer and Source Clipboard. I do like the Research Guidance in Legacy (something extra that RM doesn't have) and how you can customize EVERYTHING in Legacy (more than colors or fonts), making it "my own" program, once again, how my brain works.
It was actually a joy instead of a chore to work in a genealogical software program again.
#ROOTSMAGIC VS LEGACY VS HEREDIS HOW TO#
I tried Legacy and I was hooked! How to move around in the program made much more sense to me. It was "ok" to me, but wasn't really intuitive to my brain. I used RM for 9 months after moving from PAF.
Donna Baker you as the user needs to be comfortable with the interface and features of whatever program you choose and what is best for you might not be best for someone else.
0 kommentar(er)
